White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders might have violated an ethics regulation with her tweet about being asked to leave a Virginia restaurant, according to former U.S. Office of Government Ethics director Walter Shaub.
On Saturday morning, Sanders tweeted about being asked to leave The Red Hen, a restaurant in Lexington, Virginia, Friday night. Rather than use her personal @SarahSanders account, she used the @PressSec account.
Videos by PopCulture.com
“Last night I was told by the owner of The Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for [POTUS] and I politely left,” Sanders wrote. “Her actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so.”
Last night I was told by the owner of Red Hen in Lexington, VA to leave because I work for @POTUS and I politely left. Her actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so
— Sarah Sanders (@PressSec) June 23, 2018
Shaub, who has been openly criticizing President Donald Trump’s administration since he left the federal ethics office in July 2017, tweeted that Sanders might have violated 5 CFR 2635.702(a) by using her official government account instead of a private one. “It’s the same as if an ATF agent pulled out his badge when a restaurant tried to throw him/her out,” Shaub wrote.
Sarah, I know you don’t care even a tiny little bit about the ethics rules, but using your official account for this is a clear violation of 5 CFR 2635.702(a). It’s the same as if an ATF agent pulled out his badge when a restaurant tried to throw him/her out. https://t.co/Fj6OfBAdew
— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) June 23, 2018
“Sanders used her official [government] account to condemn a private business for personal reasons. Seeks to coerce business by using her office to get public to pressure it,” Shaub continued. “Violates endorsements ban too, which has an obvious corollary for discouraging patronage. Misuse [regulations] covers both.”
Sanders used her official govt account to condemn a private business for personal reasons. Seeks to coerce business by using her office to get public to pressure it. Violates endorsements ban too, which has an obvious corollary for discouraging patronage. Misuse reg covers both.
— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) June 23, 2018
Shaub then further explained the rules Sanders might have violated.
Opening sentences of 5 CFR 2635.702 cover both; 702(a) gives example of coercion; 702(c) gives example of endorsement. Also 2635.101(b)(8) bars preferential treatment, with obvious corollary for singling out. She can lob attacks on her own time but not using her official position
— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) June 23, 2018
“Opening sentences of 5 CFR 2635.702 cover both; 702(a) gives example of coercion; 702(c) gives example of endorsement. Also 2635.101(b)(8) bars preferential treatment, with obvious corollary for singling out,” the attorney continued. “She can lob attacks on her own time but not using her official position.”
There’s no ethics rule against Sarah Sanders fans being cartoonish hypocrites in defending merchants discriminating against gay people but howling when a merchant rejects a human rights violator based on her involvement in harming babies & children. Ridicule will have to suffice.
— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) June 23, 2018
Shaub also suggested it was hypocritical for conservatives to complain about the Red Hen management’s actions while supporting the recent Supreme Court decision in favor of a Colorado baker who refused to make a bake for a same-sex couple’s wedding because of his religious beliefs.
“There’s no ethics rule against Sarah Sanders fans being cartoonish hypocrites in defending merchants discriminating against gay people but howling when a merchant rejects a human rights violator based on her involvement in harming babies & children. Ridicule will have to suffice,” Shaub wrote.
When one Twitter user suggested Shaub was overreaching, Shaub insisted what Sanders did could be seen as a violation because she used a government account for a personal purpose.
Fleshed it out in another thread. Not interested in arguing over this. Wacky partisans are playing amateur ethics official twittersplaining how the rules I spent 15 years enforcing work, most inventing tit-for-tat exemptions that don’t exist. Not saying that’s you, but I’m done.
— Walter Shaub (@waltshaub) June 24, 2018
Stephanie Wilkinson, the owner of The Red Hen, later explained her decision to The Washington Post and insisted the entire incident was handled politely. However, she believes Sanders works for an “inhumane and unethical” administration.
“I’m not a huge fan of confrontation,” Wilkinson said. “I have a business, and I want the business to thrive. This feels like the moment in our democracy when people have to make uncomfortable actions and decisions to uphold their morals.”
Wilkinson said Sanders politely agreed to leave and even offered to pay for her and her party’s appetizers. Wilkinson told them it was “on the house.”
“I would have done the same thing again,” Wilkinson said. “We just felt there are moments in time when people need to live their convictions. This appeared to be one.”
