NFL Fans Sound off After Officials Miss Pass Interference Call in Giants vs. Patriots Game
NFL fans are still wondering why the league made pass interference and non-pass interference calls [...]
The Play
#NFL officials have gone rogue. 100-percent. This wasn’t called on the field and then wasn’t changed after it was flagged by the #Giants. So they ruled TWICE that this wasn’t defensive pass interference. Which is just blatantly wrong and a purposeful refusal to change the call. pic.twitter.com/BY2rRE6gQc
— Charles Robinson (@CharlesRobinson) October 11, 2019
Yahoo Sports writer, Charles Robinson shared the play and it's clear Jones got to Tate well before the ball got into the area. In the caption, Robinson shared how NFL officials had 100-percent gone rogue," sharing that "this wasn't called on the field and then wasn't changed after it was flagged by the Giants. So they ruled TWICE that this wasn't defensive pass interference. Which is just blatantly wrong and a purposeful refusal to change the call."
prevnextWhy Have It?
Why even have the review https://t.co/s90MXuZ1su
— Peter Bukowski (@Peter_Bukowski) October 11, 2019
NFL reporter Peter Bukowski simply asked "why even have the review," when he watched the play. It's clear officials won't overturn challenges on pass interference, so coaches might as well hold on to the flag and save the timeout. However, this rule will be a topic of discussion once the season comes to an end.
prevnextRidiculous
To miss an obvious DPI on the field like this is bad enough..to double down on a terrible call after seeing the obvious infraction in slow motion is ridiculous
— GBNEG (@GBNEG2014) October 11, 2019
This fan couldn't believe the play was not overturned. The Twitter user said, "To miss an obvious DPI on the field like this is bad enough..to double down on a terrible call after seeing the obvious infraction in slow motion is ridiculous."
prevnextExplantion of the Rule
The rule requires you to actually lock both of the handcuffs before the receiver hits the ground.
— Sam Farmer (@LATimesfarmer) October 11, 2019
Sam Farmer of the LA Times has a new explanation of the rule, writing: "The rule requires you to actually lock both of the handcuffs before the receiver hits the ground." It looks like it will come to that sooner than later.
prevnextConspiracy
I believe they’re being told not to reverse these calls. The NFL is afraid of turning PI reviews into the catch ones. The problem is that it then leads to huge inconsistencies in penalties. This is why we should get rid of reviews but it’s a different story
— df (@foleyloaded93) October 11, 2019
This fan thinks the NFL is telling officials not to reverse pass interference calls, sharing how they "believe they're being told not to reverse these calls. The NFL is afraid of turning PI reviews into the catch ones. The problem is that it then leads to huge inconsistencies in penalties. This is why we should get rid of reviews but it's a different story."
prevnextThe Patriot Way
There is a hold and a pass interference on the play. Which the Patriots have gotten away with for years. Gilmore used to be a flag machine when he played for Buffalo, now he never gets called. That’s my evidence.
— Devin William (@Devin_William03) October 11, 2019
Getting away with pass interference is something the Patriots do according to this fan. He said, "There is a hold and pass interference on the play. Which the Patriots have gotten away with for years. Gilmore used to be a flag machine when he played for Buffalo, now he never gets called. That's my evidence."
prevnextLive vs. Replay
So a play that should’ve been called pass interference live…Is not pass interference on replay.
Got it.#NYGvsNE #Giants #Patriots #TNF
— A Football Friend (@AFootballFriend) October 11, 2019
This fan may have just figured it out. The Twitter user said, "So a play that should've been called pass interference live is not pass interference on replay. Got it." Sounds like the NFL has a big problem on its hands but its something they can easily fix.
prevnextBlame Al Riveron
You nailed it at the end. This is purposeful refusal of @NFLOfficiating to overturn any PI calls or non-calls. Al Riveron is blatantly protesting the implementation of PI reviews. He’s making it so we want to get rid of it next year. That..or he is a complete moran.
— BeerTownMike (@BeerTownMike1) October 11, 2019
This fan is blaming Al Riveron who is the Senior Vice President of Officiating. He said, "This is purposeful refusal of @NFLOfficiating to overturn any PI calls or non-calls. Al Riveron is blatantly protesting the implementation of PI reviews. He's making it so we want to get rid of it next year. That..or he is a complete moron."
prev